Why do we say that it was not natural fertility and high levels of food productions that were the causes of early urbanisation?
There is no denying the fact that natural fertility and food production were the causes of early urbanisation. Following arguments could be given in its favour:
(I). Natural fertility became the base of developed agriculture.
(II). Grasslands came into existence due to natural fertility which gave impetus to animal husbandry.
(III). Agriculture and animal rearing made human life permanent because now man became a food producer. Now there was no need for him to wander from one place to another in search of food.
(IV). When life became permanent then agricultural communities came into existence which started to live each other in huts. In this way villages came into existence.
(V). Higher level of food production led to exchange of goods. As a result, size of villages began to increase. New occupations were also started which were the indicators of urbanisation.
Rate this question :
Of the new institutions that came into being once city life had begun, which would have depended on the initiative of the king?NCERT - Themes in World History
Why would the early temple have been much like a house?NCERT - Themes in World History
Why were mobile animal herders not necessarily a threat to town life?NCERT - Themes in World History
Which of the following were necessary conditions and which the causes, of early urbanisation, and which would you say were the outcome of the growth of cities:
(a) highly productive agriculture, (b) water transport, (c) the lack of metal and stone, (d) the division of labour, (e) the use of seals, (f) the military power of kings that made labour compulsory?NCERT - Themes in World History
Why do we say that it was not natural fertility and high levels of food productions that were the causes of early urbanisation?NCERT - Themes in World History
What do ancient stories tell us about the civilisation of Mesopotamia?NCERT - Themes in World History