Q. 224.0( 2 Votes )
Social diversities in a country need not be seen as a source of danger. Discuss.
Political expression of social divisions can be healthy and is very normal in a democracy. This proves as a bridge of understanding between various disadvantaged and marginal social groups, as it allows expressing their grievances and getting the government to attend those aspects at the earliest.
When one social group expresses itself, it challenges the other groups to do the same. Democracy is strengthened by this.
But a positive attitude towards diversity and a willingness to accommodate does not come about easily. People who feel segregated must fight this. This fight should take the democratic path, and the people should voice their demands in a peaceful and constitutional manner and seek a fair position through elections.
Rate this question :
Is division inherent to the working of democracy?Together With Social Science
Some people conclude that politics and social divisions should not be allowed to mix." Support this idea with arguments.
Discuss three factors that determine the outcomes of politics of social divisions. When does a social difference become a social division?Together With Social Science
What are the outcomes of the political competition on ethnic and religious lines in Northern Ireland?Together With Social Science
Explain the three factors that are crucial in deciding the outcome of the politics of social
divisions.Social Science - Board Papers
Democracy is the best way to fight for recognition and reconciliation of social diversity. Justify the statement.Full Marks - Social Science
Write the outcomes of politics of social divisions.Full Marks - Social Science
Examine the ways in which social divisions are reflected in democracy.Full Marks - Social Science
Explain the conditions in which democracies are able to accommodate social diversities.Social Science - Board Papers