NCERT Solutions for Class 9 Social Science Civics Chapter 5 - Working of InstitutionsShare
The Chapter 5 – Working of the Institutions of the Civics in Class 9th discusses important topics such as Need for Political Institutions, Parliament, The Two Houses of Parliament and Prime Minister & Council of Ministers among others. Each of these topics are introduced for the first time in Class 9 and it can get a little difficult for you to understand all of them without any additional assistance. Thus, we have provided to you easy to understand explanations for important topics which can clear your doubts and help you grasp the concepts properly.
Developed by expert teachers of Goprep, our Solutions strictly follow the syllabus set by the CBSE for Class 9 Civics. Moreover, they have been prepared using easy to understand language, which makes them pretty easier to read, understood and learn. So, if you want to master the Chapter 5 - Working of the Institutions, you can simply refer to our NCERT Solutions for the same.
NCERT Solutions for Class 9 Social Science Civics Chapter 5 - Working of Institutions
If you are elected as the President of India which of the following decision can you take on your own?
(a) Select the person you like as Prime Minister.
(b) Dismiss a Prime Minister who has a majority in Lok Sabha.
(c) Ask for reconsideration of a bill passed by both the Houses.
(d) Nominate the leaders of your choice to the Council of Ministers.
Which of the following statements about the judiciary is false?
(a) Every law passed by the Parliament needs approval of the Supreme Court
(b) Judiciary can strike down a law if it goes against the spirit of the Constitution.
(c) Judiciary is independent of the Executive.
(d) Any citizen can approach the courts if her rights are violated.
Of all the institutions that we have studied in this chapter, name the one that exercises the powers on each of the following matters.
(a) Decision on allocation of money for developing infrastructure like roads, irrigation etc. and different welfare activities for the citizens.
(b) Considers the recommendation of a committee on a law to regulate the stock exchange.
(c) Decides on a legal dispute between two state governments
(d) Implements the decision to provide relief for the victims of an earthquake.
Why is the Prime Minister in India not directly elected by the people? Choose the most appropriate answer and give reasons for your choice.
(a) In a Parliamentary democracy only the
leader of the majority party in the Lok Sabha can become the Prime Minister.
(b) Lok Sabha can remove the Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers even before the expiry of their term.
(c) Since the Prime Minister is appointed by the President there is no need for it.
(d) Direct election of the Prime Minister will
Involve lot of expenditure on election.
Three friends went to watch a film that showed the hero becoming Chief Minister for a day and making big changes in the state. Imran said this is what the country needs. Rizwan said this kind of a personal rule without institutions is dangerous. Shankar said all this is a fantasy. No minister can do anything in one day. What would be your reaction to such a film?
A teacher was making preparation for a mock parliament. She called two students to act as leaders of two political parties. She gave them an option. Each one could choose to have a majority either in the mock Lok Sabha or in the mock Rajya Sabha. If this choice was given to you, which one would you choose and why?
After reading the example of the reservation order, three students had different reactions about the role of the judiciary. Which view, according to you, is correct reading of the role of judiciary?
(a) Srinivas argues that since the Supreme Court agreed with the government, it is not independent.
(b) Anjaiah says that judiciary is independent because it could have given a verdict against the government order. The Supreme Court did direct the government to modify it.
(c) Vijaya thinks that the judiciary is neither independent nor conformist, but acts as a mediator between opposing parties. The court struck a good balance between those who supported and those who opposed the order.
|Chapter 1 - Democracy in the Contemporary World|
|Chapter 2 - What is Democracy? Why Democracy?|
|Chapter 3 - Constitutional Design|
|Chapter 4 - Electoral Politics|
|Chapter 5 - Working of Institutions|
|Chapter 6 - Democratic Rights|