Answer :

Imperial history paintings were an attempt to create a public memory of imperial triumphs. Such paintings were used as tools to showcase the British as invincible and all powerful. British considered themselves superior to the Indian on every filed. The entire British history of paintings in India is a living proof of it. It reflected their attitudes of colonial and imperial conquests. The scenes in paintings were highly dramatized British soldiers were shown as destroying everything which represented India.

These paintings celebrated British power, their victories, and their supremacy. British victories in India served as rich material for history painters in British. These printers drew on first-hand sketches and accounts of travellers to depict for the British public a favourable image of British actions in India.

In the painting by Hayman, the British had just defeated Sirajuddaulah in the famous Battle of Plassey and installed Mir Jafar as the Nawab of Murshidabad. In this act of aggression and conquest is not depicted. It shows Lord Clive being welcomed by Mir Jafar and his troops after the Battle of Plassey.

Rate this question :

How useful is this solution?
We strive to provide quality solutions. Please rate us to serve you better.
Try our Mini CourseMaster Important Topics in 7 DaysLearn from IITians, NITians, Doctors & Academic Experts
Dedicated counsellor for each student
24X7 Doubt Resolution
Daily Report Card
Detailed Performance Evaluation
caricature
view all courses
RELATED QUESTIONS :

Why did the scrolNCERT - History Part-II

Why can we think NCERT - History Part-II

Describe in your NCERT - History Part-II

In what way did tNCERT - History Part-II

Why do you think NCERT - History Part-II

Why did some artiNCERT - History Part-II