How was Quit India movement genuinely a mass movement?
Conditions that are accountable for Quit India Movement are listed below:
(A) In the year 1942, Sir Stafford Cripps was sent to India by Winston Churchill who was the conservative Prime Minister of Britain for trying and forcing to comprise with Mahatma Gandhiji while insisting that if it was to assist the British in defending India from the Axis strengths, then the Viceroy had to initially appoint an Indian as the Defense Member included in his Executive Council.
(B) The entry of Japan, the Axis power in India, during the World War II.
(C) British’s defeat in the World War.
The above situations resulted in the launch of Quit India Movement that was against the British rule. Its major attributes were that it was a mass movement that brought into its ambit thousands of ordinary India while particularly energising the young who in huge numbers left their colleges for joining the Congress leaders languishing in prisons.
Following the failure of the Cripps Mission, Gandhiji formed a decision to launch his third main movement, the Quit India campaign which initialized in August 1942. He was jailed at once but young activists arranged strikes as well as acts of sabotage all around the nation.
Rate this question :
(i) On the given political map of India, locate and label the following with appropriate symbols:
(b) Agra, the imperial capital of the Mughal
(ii) On the same outline map of India three centres related to the Indian National Movement have been marked as A, B and C. Identify them and write their correct names on the lines drawn near them.History - Board Papers
Read the following excerpt carefully and answer the questions that follow:
Why the Salt Satyagraha?
Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus, it taxes the nation’s vital necessity: it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterising this wicked dog-in-the-manger policy. From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nation’s property in all parts of India. Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi. Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of destruction. Thus, valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.
The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives the people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly to frown this folly, an unheard-of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is extracted from a starving people.
This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon the strength of the people.
(i) Why was salt monopoly introduced by the British considered as a curse by the Indians?
(ii) How did Gandhiji illustrate his tactical wisdom with regard to salt monopoly?
(iii) Explain the significance of Gandhiji’s challenge of salt protest.History - Board Papers
(1)(a) The place where Gandhiji called off the Non- Cooperation Movement.
(b) Agra, the imperial capital of Mughal.
(2) On the same outline map of India three places related to mature harappan sites are marked as A, B, C. identify them and write their correct names on the lines drawn near them.
History - Board Papers
“Tomorrow we shall break the salt tax law”
On 5 April 1930, Mahatma Gandhi spoke at Dandi:
When I left Sabarmati with my companions for this seaside hamlet of Dandi, I was not certain in my mind that we would be allowed to reach this place. Even while I was at Sabarmati there was a rumour that I might be arrested. I had thought that the Government might perhaps let my party come as far as Dandi, but not me certainly. If someone says that this betrays imperfect faith on my part, I shall not deny the charge. That I have reached here is in no small measure due to the power of peace and non-violence: that power is universally felt. The Government may, if it wishes, congratulate itself on acting as it has done, for it could have arrested every one of us. In saying that it did not have the courage to arrest this army of peace, we praise it. It felt ashamed to arrest such an army. He is a civilised man who feels ashamed to do anything which his neighbours would disapprove. The Government deserves to be congratulated on not arresting us, even if it desisted only from fear of world opinion. Tomorrow we shall break the salt tax law. Whether the Government will tolerate that is a different question. It may not tolerate it, but it deserves congratulationthe patience and forbearance it has displayed in regard to this party. … What if I and all the eminent leaders in Gujarat and in the rest of the country are arrested? This movement is based on the faith that when a whole nation is roused and on the march no leader is necessary.
(i) Why did Gandhiji start the Dandi March?
(ii) Why was Salt March notable?
(iii) The power of peace and non-violence was universally felt. Why did Gandhiji say so?History - Board Papers
A North Indian Hindu reform organisation of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, particularly active in the Punjab(tried to bring back Hindus who had converted to some other religion), which sought to revive Vedic learning and combine it with modern education in the sciences.
Illustrate how the values integrated with the rich Indian literature paved way for the scientific development of modern India.History - Board Papers
The Muslim League resolution of 1940
The League’s resolution of 1940 demanded :
That geographically contiguous units are demarcated into regions, which should be so constituted, with such territorial readjustments as may be necessary, that the areas in which the Muslims are numerically in a majority as in the north-western and eastern zones of India should be grouped to constitute “Independent States”, in which the constituent units shall be autonomous and sovereign.
(13.1) Identify the major demands of the Muslim League.
(13.2) Analyse the reasons for the demand of autonomy by the Muslim League.
(13.3) Analyse the distinctive aspects of the Muslim League Resolution of 1940.
Read the following excerpt carefully and answer the questions that follow :
A small basket of grapes
This is what Dr. Khushdeva Singh writes about his experience during one of his visits to Karachi in 1949 :
My friends took me to a room at the airport where we all sat down and talked... (and) had lunch together, I had to travel from Karachi to London... at 2.30 am... At 5.00. p.m. ... I told my friends that they had given me so generously of their time, I thought it would be too much for them to wait the whole night and suggested they must spare themselves the trouble. But nobody left until it was dinner time.... Then they said they were leaving and that I must have a little rest before emplaning. .... I got up at about 1.45 a.m. and, when I opened the door, I saw that all of them were still there.... They all accompanied me to the plane, and, before parting, presented me with a small basket of grapes. I had no words to express my gratitude for the overwhelming affection with which I was treated and the happiness this stopover had given me.
(13.1) Analyse the attitude of the people of Karachi towards Khushdeva Singh.
(13.2) Express the feelings of Khushdeva Singh at Karachi.
(13.3) “Love is stronger than hate.” Elucidate the statement in the context of this narrative.
History - Board Papers
“Quit India Movement’ was genuinely a mass movement bringing into its ambit hundreds of thousands of ordinary Indians.” Analyse the statement.
“The worst is over but Indians need to work collectively for the equality of all classes and creeds.” Substantiate the statement of Gandhiji for bringing communal peace after the partition of India.
History - Board Papers