Q. 54.0( 1 Vote )

How was non-cooperation a form of protest?

Answer :

Non-Cooperation Movement was one form of protest. It was a recognizable form of the expression of protest as well as public resentment against the Rowlatt Act. Its major objective was not extend some cooperation to the administration, hence, rendering it completely crippled.

The Non-Cooperation Movement was one form of protest by which national leaders wished to express their protest against abominable events like Jallianwala Bagh Massacre. Via launching this movement, they desired to severely punish those British who were accountable for killing hundreds of innocent persons by firing on the meeting that was occurring peacefully.


It was also a form of protest on another account as it aimed at boycotting honorary offices, government jobs, titles, educational institutions and law courts etc. The Indians wanted to exhibit their protest against rule by the British by boycotting government elections as well as foreign goods by non-payment of taxes to the government in addition to peaceful disobedience of government laws. Law courts were boycotted, whereby renowned advocates such as Motilal Nehru. Chittaranjan Das, Jawaharlal Nehru, Deshbandhu, Vallabh Bhai Patel, Babu Rajendra Prasad, Asaf Ali and Rajgopalachari left their lucrative practices in law.


Rate this question :

How useful is this solution?
We strive to provide quality solutions. Please rate us to serve you better.
Related Videos
Rapid Fire on Locomotion and Movement45 mins
The Embryonic Development62 mins
NCERT Exemplar Special | The Living World Part 225 mins
Human Evolution | An Important Concept40 mins
Human Evolution38 mins
Rapid Quiz challenge - Cell Structure & Cell Division52 mins
Different high order thinking questions based on DNA structure39 mins
Everything About Genetic DisordersFREE Class
Nernst Equation - Learn the Concept33 mins
Medelian disorder series: Thalassemia, Sickle cell anaemia & Phenylketonuria60 mins
Try our Mini CourseMaster Important Topics in 7 DaysLearn from IITians, NITians, Doctors & Academic Experts
Dedicated counsellor for each student
24X7 Doubt Resolution
Daily Report Card
Detailed Performance Evaluation
view all courses
RELATED QUESTIONS :

Read the following excerpt carefully and answer the questions that follow:

Why the Salt Satyagraha?


Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus, it taxes the nation’s vital necessity: it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterising this wicked dog-in-the-manger policy. From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nation’s property in all parts of India. Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi. Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of destruction. Thus, valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.


The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives the people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly to frown this folly, an unheard-of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is extracted from a starving people.


This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon the strength of the people.


(i) Why was salt monopoly introduced by the British considered as a curse by the Indians?


(ii) How did Gandhiji illustrate his tactical wisdom with regard to salt monopoly?


(iii) Explain the significance of Gandhiji’s challenge of salt protest.

History - Board Papers

“Tomorrow we shall break the salt tax law”

On 5 April 1930, Mahatma Gandhi spoke at Dandi:


When I left Sabarmati with my companions for this seaside hamlet of Dandi, I was not certain in my mind that we would be allowed to reach this place. Even while I was at Sabarmati there was a rumour that I might be arrested. I had thought that the Government might perhaps let my party come as far as Dandi, but not me certainly. If someone says that this betrays imperfect faith on my part, I shall not deny the charge. That I have reached here is in no small measure due to the power of peace and non-violence: that power is universally felt. The Government may, if it wishes, congratulate itself on acting as it has done, for it could have arrested every one of us. In saying that it did not have the courage to arrest this army of peace, we praise it. It felt ashamed to arrest such an army. He is a civilised man who feels ashamed to do anything which his neighbours would disapprove. The Government deserves to be congratulated on not arresting us, even if it desisted only from fear of world opinion. Tomorrow we shall break the salt tax law. Whether the Government will tolerate that is a different question. It may not tolerate it, but it deserves congratulationthe patience and forbearance it has displayed in regard to this party. … What if I and all the eminent leaders in Gujarat and in the rest of the country are arrested? This movement is based on the faith that when a whole nation is roused and on the march no leader is necessary.


(i) Why did Gandhiji start the Dandi March?


(ii) Why was Salt March notable?


(iii) The power of peace and non-violence was universally felt. Why did Gandhiji say so?

History - Board Papers

The Muslim League resolution of 1940

The League’s resolution of 1940 demanded :


That geographically contiguous units are demarcated into regions, which should be so constituted, with such territorial readjustments as may be necessary, that the areas in which the Muslims are numerically in a majority as in the north-western and eastern zones of India should be grouped to constitute “Independent States”, in which the constituent units shall be autonomous and sovereign.


(13.1) Identify the major demands of the Muslim League.


(13.2) Analyse the reasons for the demand of autonomy by the Muslim League.


(13.3) Analyse the distinctive aspects of the Muslim League Resolution of 1940.


OR


Read the following excerpt carefully and answer the questions that follow :


A small basket of grapes


This is what Dr. Khushdeva Singh writes about his experience during one of his visits to Karachi in 1949 :


My friends took me to a room at the airport where we all sat down and talked... (and) had lunch together, I had to travel from Karachi to London... at 2.30 am... At 5.00. p.m. ... I told my friends that they had given me so generously of their time, I thought it would be too much for them to wait the whole night and suggested they must spare themselves the trouble. But nobody left until it was dinner time.... Then they said they were leaving and that I must have a little rest before emplaning. .... I got up at about 1.45 a.m. and, when I opened the door, I saw that all of them were still there.... They all accompanied me to the plane, and, before parting, presented me with a small basket of grapes. I had no words to express my gratitude for the overwhelming affection with which I was treated and the happiness this stopover had given me.


(13.1) Analyse the attitude of the people of Karachi towards Khushdeva Singh.


(13.2) Express the feelings of Khushdeva Singh at Karachi.


(13.3) “Love is stronger than hate.” Elucidate the statement in the context of this narrative.


History - Board Papers