Answer :
Rate this question :
How useful is this solution?
We strive to provide quality solutions. Please rate us to serve you better.
PREVIOUSMention the limitation of per capita income as an indicator of development.NEXTKerala, with lower per capita income, has a better human development ranking than Haryana. Hence, per capita income is not a useful criterion at all and should not be used to compare states. Do you agree? Discuss.
Related Videos
Let's Calculate - A Guide to an Economist's Dictionary54 mins
Development49 mins
Champ Quiz | Development34 mins
Personality Development Tips42 mins
Smart Revision | Quiz on Resources and Development37 mins
Genius Quiz | Development29 mins
Resources and Development34 mins
Classification of Resources on the Basis of Development43 mins
Classification of Soils41 mins


















Try our Mini CourseMaster Important Topics in 7 DaysLearn from IITians, NITians, Doctors & Academic Experts
view all courses
Dedicated counsellor for each student
24X7 Doubt Resolution
Daily Report Card
Detailed Performance Evaluation


RELATED QUESTIONS :
Why are public facilities needed for the development of the country?
All In One - EconomicsCompare the level of development in India taking at least three states on the basis of various aspects other than income.
All In One - EconomicsExplain two reasons for the need for environment-friendly economic growth and one suggestion achieve it.
All In One - EconomicsWhat will happen if we over-exploit underground water in arid regions of India?
All In One - EconomicsIdentify different thrust areas of Human Development.
All In One - EconomicsWhat is the significance of sustainable development for a human being?
All In One - EconomicsWhat is the main criterion used by the World Bank in classifying different countries? Describe its limitations.
All In One - EconomicsWhat is the implication of having high HDI for the country?
All In One - Economics