Q. 114.7( 6 Votes )
‘Although the level of income is an important indicator of development, it is an inadequate measure of the level of development.’ Justify the statement.
Although the level of income is an important indicator of development, it is an inadequate measure of the level of development. Money can buy things that can be one factor on which our life depends like food. But the quality of non-material things like freedom, security and respect cannot be bought with money. We cannot buy pollution free environment, unadulterated medicines and peace with money. Schools, colleges, parks, hospitals etc are the facilities which cannot be run individually. There has to be a collective effort of team work between the government and society in providing these to the general public. Therefore, money in your pocket cannot buy all the goods and services that you may need to live well. Income by itself is not a completely adequate indicator of material goods and services that citizens are able to use.
Rate this question :
Give two example where an average income is used for comparing situations.Full Marks - Social Science
Why are public facilities needed for the development of the country?All In One - Economics
Compare the level of development in India taking at least three states on the basis of various aspects other than income.All In One - Economics
Explain two reasons for the need for environment-friendly economic growth and one suggestion achieve it.All In One - Economics
What will happen if we over-exploit underground water in arid regions of India?All In One - Economics
In which category, India was placed in the World Development Report, 2012?All In One - Economics
Identify different thrust areas of Human Development.All In One - Economics
What is the significance of sustainable development for a human being?All In One - Economics