Answer :
In a lecture delivered at the University of Sorbonne in 1882, the French philosopher Ernst Renan (1823-92) outlined his understanding of what makes a nation. The lecture was subsequently published as a famous essay entitled 'Qu'est-ce qu'une nation?' ('What is a Nation?').
In this essay, Renan criticises the notion suggested by others that a nation is formed by a common language, race, religion, or territory:
1. A nation is the culmination of a long past of endeavours, sacrifice and devotion. A heroic past, great men, glory, that is the social capital upon which one bases a national idea.
2. To have common glories in the past, to have a common will in the present, to have performed great deeds together, to wish to perform still more, these are the essential conditions of being a people.
3. A nation is, therefore, a large-scale solidarity. Its existence is a daily plebiscite. A province is its inhabitants; if anyone has the right to be consulted, it is the inhabitant.
4. A nation never has any real interest in annexing or holding on to a country against its will. The existence of nations is a good thing, a necessity even. Their existence is a guarantee of liberty, which would be lost if the world had only one law and only one master.
In this essay, Renan criticises the notion suggested by others that a nation is formed by a common language, race, religion, or territory:
1. A nation is the culmination of a long past of endeavours, sacrifice and devotion. A heroic past, great men, glory, that is the social capital upon which one bases a national idea.
2. To have common glories in the past, to have a common will in the present, to have performed great deeds together, to wish to perform still more, these are the essential conditions of being a people.
3. A nation is, therefore, a large-scale solidarity. Its existence is a daily plebiscite. A province is its inhabitants; if anyone has the right to be consulted, it is the inhabitant.
4. A nation never has any real interest in annexing or holding on to a country against its will. The existence of nations is a good thing, a necessity even. Their existence is a guarantee of liberty, which would be lost if the world had only one law and only one master.
Rate this question :
How useful is this solution?
We strive to provide quality solutions. Please rate us to serve you better.
Related Videos
Rise of Nationalism in Europe38 mins
Together With | Rise of Nationalism in Europe35 mins
How Napoleon was Responsible for the Rise of Nationalism?43 mins
Smart Revision | Mega Quiz : Rise of Nationalism in Europe34 mins
The Making of Germany and Italy49 mins
What is Nationalism?26 mins
Together With | Unifications of Italy, Germany and United Kingdom34 mins
NCERT | Nationalism in Europe Part-152 mins
NCERT | Nationalism in Europe part-251 mins
Champ Quiz | Nationalism in India38 mins




















Try our Mini CourseMaster Important Topics in 7 DaysLearn from IITians, NITians, Doctors & Academic Experts
view all courses
Dedicated counsellor for each student
24X7 Doubt Resolution
Daily Report Card
Detailed Performance Evaluation


RELATED QUESTIONS :
In what ways producer create artificial scarcity?
All In One - Economics